Newhope4unme: A Male Name Makes a Difference

Newhope4unme: A Male Name Makes a Difference

A Male Name Makes a Difference

     According to Harding, (2009), this day in history, blog writer, James Cartrand, exposed to the world that he is actually female blog writer, Mary Elizabeth Williams. For many years, her career as a writer barely made ends meet. At the same time, crude remarks and condescending criticisms made her feel inferior. To adapt, she quit mentioning that she had children or worked from home. On a whim, she decided to submit with a male name.


     The whim paid off. It does matter in the business world what gender a person originates from. The quality of her writing did not change, only her name changed. No longer did she suffer haggling and disrespect. Now she gained fewer revisions, compliments, and a huge pay raise.

     Throughout history, female writers have used pseudonyms to achieve acceptance. In the early nineteenth century, it sounds like a necessary act. However, in today’s twenty-first century it is a horrific to even fathom.

     People think they need alter identities to protect themselves. Secrecy is the best way to save a person’s family from harm, as well as not subjecting themselves to sexual innuendo or even worse death threats.

     Nonetheless, Mary Elizabeth proves that just because the women’s Suffrage movement gained the rights for women to own property, join the military, vote in public elections, and work outside of the home for wages, things really have not changed as far as acceptance goes. Whether the bias is subconscious or not, a female writer still earns half the wages of her male counterpart (Harding, 2009).

     Many observers of American Western culture believe women are equal to men in this country. Sadly, this story points to the opposite. The battle long ago started by the Suffragette’s still continues. The young women of the twenty-first century think there are enough female representatives in the political realm. However, women do not even make for half of representation. Do they know the “Glass Ceiling” still exists? Is this our best representation to Other World countries?

     Should we educate our wives, mothers, sisters, daughters, nieces, and granddaughters about what issues they face besides global warming and violence, or should we just begin by naming them Samuel, Franklin, and George?

References

Harding. K. (2009). Write like a man. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from. http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/14/male_pseudonyms/print.html

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_qLjjXzDodd4/ResIa8jZSFI/AAAAAAAAAVI/39yvqXz7NgQ/s320/media.gif

Newhope4unme: Thinking about plastic surgery? Think quickly!

Newhope4unme: Thinking about plastic surgery? Think quickly!

Thinking about plastic surgery? Think quickly!

The current health care reform bill causing such a debate in the United States Senate, calls for a “Bo-Tax” on optional plastic surgery. The people who choose to have such procedures, as Botox injections or breast augmentation will pay an extra five percent tax to help offset the cost of medically necessary health care for other people. Does this sound like a good idea?

According to National Organization for Women’s (NOW), president, Terry O’Neil, (2009), “Now they are going to put a tax on middle-aged women in a society that devalues them for being middle-aged?” This is the same organization in 1968 protested outside the Miss America Pageant demanding an end to unreasonable ridiculous good looks criteria. In today’s culture, it is a well-known fact that older people remain victims of discrimination. In order to fight for women in today’s culture, superficial looks become just as important as breast reconstruction is for mastectomy patients or burn victims skin reconstruction. Are those cosmetic procedures unnecessary?

American economy is suffering. Many women must enter or re-enter the workforce to supplement their families income or provide their families only income. In order for them to fight favoritism shown to younger job applicants, they must look the part so they only differentiating characteristic comes from their skills and resume. O’Neil (2009) also states, I know a lot of women whose earning power stalled out or kicked down as they entered into their 50s, unlike their male counterparts’, whose really went up.” The feminist movement must favor plastic surgery in order to fight this new form of added discrimination. Celebrity Gloria Steinman, a previous plastic surgery recipient, stated, “I’ve met women who’ve had to lie their ages down as much as 20 years to get or keep jobs as everything from waitresses to high-level consultants.” When a person recognizes the true reality of the American culture, it becomes depressing.

Women know that being valued on the merit of what is inside their bodies is a joke. Take for example Susan Boyle, this women, who possesses amazing singing ability, received the classification of joke as she stepped onto the stage to deliver her first performance.

When looks separate us from money feminism must stand up for the pop culture’s beauty. If a person needs to provide for their family as well as themselves and an eye lift helps them to achieve it, they should not have to pay extra for the help. Would a normal person opt for surgery or live in poverty?

References

Warner, J. (2009). Bo-Tax backlash. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/category/judith-warner/

Mattie, P. (2006). Beauty trend archives. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.piercemattie.com/blogs/plumping_parties_plastic_su.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.piercemattie.com/blogs/beauty_trends/&usg=__BLLwYd8A5irv8O6Q-0-vAkcI3Is=&h=354&w=470&sz=23&hl=en&start=4&sig2=qM4XHbPT9LKsphWFBKUiMg&um=1&tbnid=lDZDdLGNgYXmSM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=129&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dplastic%2Bsurgery%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1&ei=uUshS56KBIel8AbVvNWFAQ

For a Person's Own Good

Should weight affect a person’s ability to graduate? At Pennsylvania’s Lincoln University it does. One of the requirements for successful graduation at this university is a Body Mass Index (BMI) 30 or under 30. Otherwise, these students marked as clinically obese, must enroll in a remedial fitness class that meets at least three days a week. The directive began in 2006, when directors felt compelled to help students with their health (Harding, 2009).

According to Harding (2009), this entails blatant discrimination against the obese students. She believes if they insist on fitness for their students then the testing for the unfit should not just based on weight. In fact, prevented from enrolling in the fitness class are students who possess a BMI less than the measurement of 30.

When people first read the description of the class, it sounds fun. The activities include water aerobics and Tai Bo. If someone has ever taken classes, they know paying for education is much different from public education.

So, how would they feel if told they had to pay tuition to take the class? Along with the fact, that their fellow classmates who have less than 30 BMI have no such requirements. In fact, they receive their degrees even when they hold lower GPAs. “As Tiana Lewis said in an editorial for the school newspaper, "I came here to get an education which, as a three time honor student, is something I have been doing quite well, despite the fact that I have a slightly high Body Mass Index." Lewis tested out of the class but chose to take it anyway…”

It was not until Bill Clinton was president people realized that weight was a growing problem for the United States. Every adult knows that should not be overweight. Should the government take on the worry of the steadily increasing waist sizes of America for their own good? Does the American government have the right to take the choice out of the citizen’s hand? With the story fast becoming National News, which side of the debate should the popular culture group take?

References

Harding, K. (2009). You must be this thin to graduate. Retrieved December 4, 2009, from. http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/01/lincoln_university/index.html">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/01/lincoln_university/index.html

Eating is Just Not Food in America (A Journal Critique)

In America, food often defines social class as pointed out by Sue Mattheson’s critique and Margaret Visser’s detective novel. They way citizens of a culture behave towards their food often defines social roles in that culture. America has defined the family celebration to take place around food. Sometimes the celebration is a special holiday or just the everyday dining experience. Generally, dinning does not happen alone and women are the preparers of this food. American society considers dining alone by choice a peculiar habit. Not only does whom a person chooses to eat with, what they choose to eat determines place. The poor eat hot dogs made with fillers and the wealthy eat free-range steak. In both of the author’s writings, the role of food preparation traditionally belongs to females of society based on former Puritan heritages. Women usually dine and prepare wealthier and healthier foods, such as, low fat chicken, salad, and white wine.

Historically these norms have changed throughout the years, and they will continue to do so. With both authors, pointing out these various differences it is quite easy to determine they try to show America’s Patriarchy and its customs. They refuse to see women as cooks who must appease the appetites of the world’s hungry as they have though history. They show that just like murder, food endeavors to show itself in all social classes, genders, and races. Murder happens in elite society, middleclass society, and in the class of poverty (Grafton, 2008).

References

Matheson. S. (2008). Food is never just something to eat: Sue Grafton's culinary critique of mainstream America. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from. The Journal of Popular Culture, 41(2008)
Trinity College Dublin. (2009).Good eating habits. Retrieved November 28, 2009,  from. http://www.tcd.ie/collegehealthweek/good-eating-habits

Religion Leaders Teaching Followers to Pray Curses

Usually people pray for blessings to pour out upon humankind and planet. They pray for healing and help. Nevertheless, some believers have changed the requests for help. They are pleading with God to remove an evil leader from the Earth. Some may wonder who this evil leader is. These believers are calling upon God to remove the leadership of the President of the United States, Barrack Obama.  
Pastor Wiley Drake, (2009) is famous for preaching statements such as, “Ladies and gentlemen, if they’re a Muslim, they’re a danger to this country.” Obviously, Drake does not worry about being politically correct or hurting anyone’s feelings. This June Pastor Drake gave a live radio interview to DJ Colmes in California. During the interview, Colmes questioned Pastor Drake three times about praying for the president. First, he inquired, “Are you praying for his death?” Wiley replied with a simple, “Yes.” Then Colmes questioned him further with, “So you’re praying for the death of the president of the Unite States?” Again, Pastor Drake replied with a simple, “Yes.” Colmes then presented him with, “You would like for the president of the United States to die?” Drake’s last answer was, “If he does not turn to God and does not turn his life around, I am asking God to enforce imprecatory prayers that are throughout the Scripture that would cause him death, that's correct."
The New Internal Version of the scripture reads, “May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership. May his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.” Psalm 109: 8, 9 (BibleGateway, 2009). Pastor Wiley Drake contends imprecatory prayer may sound malicious, but it is not as immoral as it sounds. He told reporter Lilly Fowler, "I’m not for a Christian or anybody killing somebody. That’s God’s business." In other words, he is saying people follow Scriptures example. If incredible acts happen after that, it is God’s will. In addition, Pastor Drake points out that Martin Luther and John Calvin prayed imprecatory prayer this way.
It follows that, the next question people want answered is does this type of praying have true foundations in theology studies. According to Stephen Chapman from Duke University’s Center for Jewish Studies, imprecatory prayer took place upon Jewish and Christian traditions from the Ancient Near East. However, this tradition only happens to remind those faithful to covenants they held/hold with God, and if they did not quickly recall the covenants and get back to following God’s commands, their covenants would be broken and what the consequences of breaking that covenant meant to them.

The population may think this is limited to a few religious freaks. Nonetheless, signs show us this type of imprecatory prayer is gaining popularity. Brad Hirschfield, Beliefnet’s Rabbi, notes a top search now presented for research is none other than Psalm 109. Businesses have also taken note of this trend. A line of bumper stickers along with T-shirts have the logo “Pray for Obama” while simultaneously pointing to the passage in Psalm 109 that pleads for a quick end to current evil and wicked leadership.

Many may view imprecatory prayer as grossly immoral and incorrect. At the same time, there are many people who view abortion, partial-birth abortion, and same-sex marriages as grossly immoral and incorrect. Their beliefs come from any translation of the Bible. Many other people who view religion as foolish may believe imprecatory prayer does not deserve protection under the First Amendment to the Constitution.

The latest news is that Pastor Drake recanted the wish for imprecatory prayer against President Obama. Although his reasons are not that he wants blessings and good wishes, he would ask followers to appeal to God with imprecatory prayer until there is a new leader. His rationale is that President Obama is guilty of treason against America and wants him to live long enough to stand trial for the crime of treason. Pastor Wiley Drake contends Obama is not a United States citizen. This makes his presidency entitlement illegitimate (Fowler, 2009).

All humanity should have the right to voice their beliefs, as long as they do not cause physical harm to another person, property, or themselves. To some imprecatory prayer is synonymous with a hate speech and at the same time abortion is synonymous with murder to others. Are the black and white lines indistinguishable or are they as clear as the line between good versus evil?

References

BibleGateway. (2009). Passage results: Psalm 109 (new international version). Retrieved November 23, 2009, from. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+109&version=NIV

Fowler, L. (2009). Praying for Obama’s death. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from. http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2009/11/23/praying_for_obama_death/index.html

Hillnery, L. (2009). Can the constitution survive terrorism. Retrieved November 24, 2009, from. http://www.regent.edu/general/library/about_the_library/news_publications/images/ConstitutionDayPic.PNG

Offbeat. (2009). Watching TV online. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from. http://www.textually.org/tv/archives/images/set3/bible-1.jpg